5.16.2006

Bush 35 or 36

Last night was somewhere around Bush’s 35th or 36th televised address to the nation. There’s been so few I’ve lost count. Bush press conferences have also been just as scarce.

For those who don’t really follow media relations, 35 televised addresses to the nation in 5 years, 4 months in office have to be the fewest for a two-term president since the advent of television. Even by a time schedule the Bush event is indeed a rarity. But when considering everything that has taken place in the last five years, not engaging the American people into the business of its government could very possibly explain why Bush is hovering at around 30% approval rating.

Most conservatives will disagree with me on that, however.

Along with having a substance problem, the administration also has a delivery problem. For some reason conservatives have developed such a disdain for media that they feel they should avoid or ignore the media at all times. The one sure way to guarantee bad press is to have no press.

Nonetheless, on to the substance of Bush’s speech. Having secure borders is the most sovereign aspect of any nation. On average around 1300 illegal immigrants cross the southern border with Mexico each day. Nearly five years after 9/11 why is this happening? It must be noted, though, that not a single hijacker on 9/11 illegally crossed that border. Not one. So, even though the terrorist threat that sent us into war was not a result of a porous Mexican/American border, it is vital for future protection that the American government successfully enacts policy that will protect this nation from a terrorist exploitation of a border that gives access to 1300 people a day to our soil. It’s just common sense.

Bringing in the overstretched Guard is only part of the solution. Just six months ago Department of Homeland Security said using the Guard to seal the border would be “horribly over-expensive and very difficult.” So again, despite the judgment of his cabinet, President Bush wants to deploy the military. Why does Bush think the military is the solution for all America’s ills? Do Bush advisors think the public only trusts him when he’s speaking about military operations? Not only do we have a substance problem and a delivery problem, we also have a one-track mind problem.

To be extremely honest, I’m not entirely against using the Guard. Now, do I think 6,000 or so two week rotating Guardsmen will make that much a difference? Nope. The real solution lies in the details, and details are something this administration isn’t concerned with. Immigration troubles did not begin overnight. They were progressively getting worse long before 9/11. A serious coherent policy would target the large businesses that chiefly depend upon illegal immigrant labor and who also attract illegals into the country as part of their business program. The policy would also target the very agency responsible for immigration services, the INS. Throwing a bunch of money at the INS is not the solvent, however. Money, training, expertise, morale, manpower and enforcement/deportation are all vital components for any restructuring of immigration policy.

Last nights speech contained none of the above. I’m afraid Bush’s speech and the subsequent policies set forth therein are too little too late.

NOTE: I'm am also guest blogging at Blanton's and Ashton's.

Tags:
, , , , ,

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm against it anyway but it does not seem like an optimal choice. If you listen to anyone who appears to be an expert on the subject it seems that training and increasing the border patrol is the only way to go. This whole thing is , to me, is a ridiculous patch in a system that has been faulty for a long time. If this was that big of a deal they would have and should have dealt with it a long time ago. They didn't. So now they are going to patch it up. Not really fix it.




Like they did New Orleans.

In this case, with Bush I mean, it is a good thing they do not let him talk too much. He makes very little sense and does because he does not understand half of what is written in his speeches anyway.

Jeremy said...

Hmmm..interesting take on this.

I have to say that the immigration issue (perhaps because I live in Maine) isn't usually on the radar screen for me.

What I can tell you is that some terrorists tried to get across the Canadian border (see: Millennium bomb plot that the 'weak on terrorism' president Clinton diffused), and I work with someone whose family has worked on the border patrol between Maine and Canada for years.

I think the fact that the Bush administration has cried wolf so many times in the name of national security, it reduces their credibility in terms of linking this particular issue to national security. In other words, ever since they tried to tell us importing drugs from Canada was a terror threat, I've pretty much ignored anything else they've tried to link to terrorism.

I just listened to a caller on Air America who lives in Texas, describing numerous hand-made signs in the windows of cars down there that were anti-immigrant, and either borderline racist or overtly racist. This is the vote Bush and the Republicans will try to court when it comes to issues of immigration, legal and otherwise.. The good ole bigot vote. How cute.

Jacob said...

The border issue for many Amercians is one of those things they have not thought of that often or that hard. I think unless you live in areas close to the borders or areas that are overwhelmed with immigrants.

It is one thing I have not given much thought to.
There are many things which need attention in this country and as with immigration they needed attention a long time ago. For me it is all a little too late.

Kent said...

Baby, you are absolutely correct.

Bush's problems ALL stem from bad (or the lack of) communication.

Humour and last laugh said...

In a way it is wiser to keep low media profile. Here the politicians are victims of over exposure and over statement.