8.25.2005

Oil Trap. Caps?

I want to change the subject here because I’m tired of giving the self ordained Pat Robertson (didn’t Napoleon ordain himself also?) more coverage than what he deserves. Instead, I want to turn some attention towards someone who I often times find myself in agreement with and something that right now is affecting us all. Fareed Zakaria is one of my favorite political commentators/authors. I’m sure some who read this site will label him a liberal PhD., but he’s anything but. Nonetheless, Zakaria’s latest Newsweek column outlines a serious problem facing not only our foreign policy but also every American consumer and taxpayer: our dependence on foreign oil.

It’s hard to talk oil dependency in Washington these days. Big Oil does indeed control the White House and the federal government at nearly every level. Oil is also something that the president’s family makes millions from, and so do many others in the administration. So it’s no coincidence that Bush’s recently passed energy bill gives Big Oil the largest tax breaks in the history of this country. In sum, the bill provides huge tax breaks for the wealthiest of the wealthy while the little guy pays the bills. I’m not sure how providing mammoth tax breaks to an industry that will generate 30% higher profits than the last fiscal year will do anything to curb our dependence on foreign oil, much less ease gas prices. This is a form of corporate welfare, so why shouldn’t the poor receive the same?

Certainly one thing the American people have yet to realize is the backdoor business that oil revenues bring to support terrorism. Fifteen of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, a country that is making an EXTRA $300 million a day from rising gas prices. If it’s not in our national interest to ensure that a terrorist sponsoring state such as Saudi Arabia does not profit at our expense, and 9/11 was a steep price to pay, then nothing is. There is a direct link between oil rich countries and Islamic extremism. There is also a direct link between American rich Big Oil companies and those same terrorist sponsoring countries. Our dependence on foreign oil is definitely a foreign policy issue as well as domestic, but one that is largely ignored by the current administration and the public.

Saudi Arabia will probably have a budget surplus of more than $26 billion this year because the price of oil is so much higher than anticipated,” notes Zakaria. “That means it can keep the old ways going, bribing the Wahhabi imams, funding the Army and National Guard, spending freely on patronage programs. (And that would still leave plenty to fund dozens of new palaces and yachts.) Ditto for other corrupt, quasi-feudal oil states.”

The reverse is true in America. The huge profits Big Oil will make this year will not funnel down to easing our dependence on oil or federal regulations on automobile gas mileage, but instead to increasing our consumption and to fund political campaigns to politicians that will guarantee more and bigger tax breaks in the future. The cycle keeps going. Terrorist sponsoring states are dependant upon American big oil to protect them from regime change. The status quo remains. September 11th has taught us nothing.

Americans are the most mobile people on Earth. Never has any group of people mobilized so quickly and so frequently than America. Just try and put limits on us and see what happens. Even high gas prices have not changed our driving habits. Since colonial times, we have always said, “Do not close us in.” No other nation on this planet can understand our ability, or hold dearly as we do our right to go anywhere we want at anytime. Not even Canada can travel like we do; and when they do, they do it in America. We hate limits like we hate taxes, but our mobility should not come at the expense of terrorism on our soil, or to prop up terrorist regimes.

One thing that state lawmakers are looking at to help with gas prices is placing caps on them. On September 1st, Hawaii will be the first state to implement gas caps. This is a controversial move that has both the federal government and Big Oil firmly against it. It’s not clear whether placing caps on gas prices will do anything to bring the prices at the pumps down; in fact it might just do the opposite. As long as the federal government is doing nothing to ease our burden then caps on gasoline at the state level seems to be an appropriate step that may at the very least catch someone’s attention. Zakaria says it best: “We don't need a Manhattan Project to find our way out of our current energy trap. The technologies already exist. But what we're searching for is perhaps even harder—political leadership and vision.”

13 comments:

CaliValleyGirl said...

Fareed Zakaria is hawt! In a geeky kind of way. I love it when he is a guest on the Daily Show...oh, did I mention the Daily Show again? *Sigh* I swear, Jon Stewart literally flirts with the guy. They are so cute together, Jon is always hero-worshipping him. And doesn't he have his own show on PBS now?
And yes, I agree that we are funding terrorism with our dependance upon oil. However, it's not like if we stopped buying oil, Saudi would lose revenues, and thus lose funding for all its ventures...China is a huge market for oil and will only get bigger in the future...so what we don't buy will just go over there.
So it's not like by becoming less oil dependant (which I fully support) will kill two birds with one stone.

Chris said...

Very true CVG. But becoming less dependant on foreign oil at least takes the burden and the responsibility off of us in regards to supporting terrorism. Then we can at least blame China and maybe invade them :)

Or better yet, maybe the Saudia Royal family should open up their oil business and share the oil revenue with their poverty stricken citizens. That too would go a long way in fighting terrorism. As well as allowing capitalism and private business to expand in order to reduce their dependancy on only one industry. And again, that goes back to states in the Middle East owning up and doing their part to combat terrorism. I think we both agree that America isn't in this alone, and it's not only us and our habits that need to change.

I did watch the clip of the daily show you sent me a while back. If Zakaria is a guest a lot, then I'm going to have to start watching it.

But you are very correct with your two birds with one stone point.

Thanks for reading.

CaliValleyGirl said...

Hmmm...the gas cap thing...I had no idea that Hawaii was going to do that, and I was just there for 3 weeks. Strange...
When West Berlin existed, prices there were the same in the rest of Germany, even though all the products, with some exceptions, had to be airlifted there. They were able to do this by taxing the rest of Germany with the so-called Berlin tax, to support the living costs of those living in the isolation of East Germany.
I don't think that Hawaii having a gas cap will affect much, because most likely the money will just be made up elsewhere by having a hidden Hawaii tax...it won't be called that, but the oil companies sure won't let themselves get reemed by some teeny tiny blue state. It'll just backfire and fall onto the rest of us.

CaliValleyGirl said...

http://www.foreignexchange.tv/

David Schantz said...

Some times I'd love to go back to the good old days, when most gas stations were independenty owned, now a good deal of them are owned or controled by the big oil companies. Back then we had gas wars, not a war against terrorism, and we the people were winning. Great post.

God Bless America, God Save The Republic

Anonymous said...

Zakaria says it best: “We don't need a Manhattan Project to find our way out of our current energy trap. The technologies already exist. But what we're searching for is perhaps even harder—political leadership and vision.”

I absolutely agree. I don't care if it comes from a Republican or a Democrat. We have a serious problem here, and it requires a very practical soltuion. We are getting nothing but platitudes from the Bush Administration, and nothing but whining from the Dems in Congress... so where does that leave us? Not in a very good state, but hopefully in this vacuum of common sense and good ideas, maybe something of value will step to the front. One can only hope.

Cooper said...

Daly show = funny.
I like Zakaria and am tired that “liberal PhD, liberal academic types” have been made into such a bad word. I say bring back the liberal PhD’S.

The whole oil thing is beyond me. Of course we need to lessen our dependency on foreign oil, as you have stated here it’s not like they have a shortage; their prices are up possibly due to King Abdullah preparing for potential problems with Iran and as he may be preparing to possibly buy off dissent in these troubled times with Iran threatening and all. Gotta bribe the world and when threatened the new King may have to buy off dissent and pay off those fancy boats and homes you know.
As for gas caps I don’t know much about the whole process or what it does economically not being an econ person. From what I have read part of our problem is that our refineries find sour crude, ( the kind from Saudi Arabia), harder to refine to clean low sulfur fuel than the sweet grades like the kind from, New Mexico and the North Sea. Also one of the major driving forces over the last few years has been speculation in the market over twenty two billion dollars worth of new speculative money which has caused the price to rise dramatically and I believe the speculative money is not on the OPEC but on Brent and WTI. So of course part of this problem is a problem of big business, investing and such all of which are beyond my scope.
That having been said we certainly should be doing something and I can’t help but wonder why our government over the last, at the very least decade if not much longer, has not been addressing this issue.Why haven't we demanded it? So where do we start? Short term something will evidently have to be done with the market itself as the other solutions I assume, such as alternative power, new oil wells or whatever they are called, are all long term. So if the short term solution has to be caps maybe it has to be caps. I don’t know. Do we have another economist in the house?
We have been funding terrorists and terrorist governments forever but it seems when it hits the pocket of big business or people heavily invested in these companies this country tends to look the other way. When does this stop?



All this having been said we should have been doing this already and for along time and yea so where do we start?

Jacob said...

This whole thing is beyond my scope. Very nice points from everyone. I think people are now just starting to "get it". I know I gave the problem of finding a solution to our dependance on foreign oil very little thought until now.I know we fund terrorist by the very fact but also admittedly don't know enough about it and have been apathetic to it as has most of the country. I do think the time is well past due.

Craig said...

Now you really have something I can talk about here. What the real problem is, and no one seems to talk about is not a supply problem from the Middle East, but a supply prolbem getting gas and other products to the market.

The oil price, and consequently gas price has to rise high enough for new companies to want to enter into a new industry. When more companies beleive they can capture more market shart, i.e. take some away from the big oil companies and go back to independantly owned like David eluded to earlier.

There is nothing Bush can really do except try to enitce more companies to get involved, perhaps by the tax cuts you so writhingly hate. Gas caps are wrong. Sometimes a market must be be allowed to run it's course, as painful as it may be.

Thank you for changing it up a bit.

Chris said...

I have officially decided that I have the smartest readers in all of blogland.

Y'all are damn good!

I love a good Marxist discussion.

CVG, I think you are absolutely right. The East German example is entirely on target. If, and in the case of Hawaii, caps are placed on fuel, then as you say, another tax will be placed on something else to make up for the difference. Your secret tax is on cue. Are you sure you're not an economist?

Taylor, is that you?? Very good examples my man. The price for fuel is actually a lot higher than its market value currently. I think Craig refers to that as a bubble. So it is possible to pay higer than market value for a commodity just not lower than market value. Strange, but I do agree with you.

Schantz, that's way before my time :) What is this mystic world you speak of?

Paolo, thanks for reading. I don't think I've seen you around here. You are welcome any time.

Alice, yeah I see nothing wrong with the PhD's either (since I am one). I don't know much about the oil business/refinery stuff also. But I am with you on the notion that these are things that we should have been working on for at least 20 years now. I do blame Clinton more than Bush. Clinton, who supposedly is so full of insight, should have planned better for our future dependency on foreign oil. I don't expect Bush to do anything about it. But Clinton let me down. I do think he is more to blame than Bush.

I gotta take a break.....I'll be back.

Chris said...

Businessman, yeah it's time the public gets smart about a few things. This isn't rocket science, it's actually much more common sense than anything. But when billions of dollars are involved and politicians, nothing about it will be simple.

Craig, I'm glad we finally have something to agree on. I do agree that competition needs to step up-- meaning other businesses need to get into the market. Very true, supply is not the problem; it's the competition, which is the very basis of capitalism. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a near monopoly on an industry also a form of price controls? So to play devil's advocate, what's the differnce between caps and little market competition?

Wait, I do find something I disagree with you about :) Bush can do something. His hands are not tied in this matter. But I don't expect him to do anything. He personally makes millions from oil. I suppose if I made millions from oil then I would want huge tax breaks to the companies so that my profit margin will increase. Yeah screw the poor :)

No seriously, I do agree with you on this Craig. It's not that I'm for caps, but as long as the federal government does nothing, then caps at the state level are appropriate. State governments don't care about markets, they care about policy. And since the oil business is already regulated by the federal government, them stepping in to regulate prices is not all that unbelievable. After all, by providing insanely high tax breaks to Big Oil, the federal government is controlling prices as well. Big Oil is not a laissez faire industry.

Thanks to all for reading.

Craig said...

My problem with price caps, someone has to pay the difference. Guess who that is, the taxpayers, only this time in higher taxes so that state governments can generate the cap. At least without caps, the consumers can decide how much to buy according to their use.

Your monopoly question is quite good. Now the oil industry is closer to a oligopoly, but that is splitting hairs. Monopoly means that consumers are price taker. Free market means consumers are price makers. The oligopoly rests in between. The oil companies know they have the ability to set prices, but also understand there is a certain point of no return. We need more competition to enable the U.S. to move towards free markets. I would really like to see Bush try to implement thata idea, but doubt I will ever see that in the media. If anyone ever comes across it before me, let me know.

Chris said...

Craig, thanks for checking back. I agree that caps would only result in another tax on something else in order to pay the difference. But I also still think that a near monopoly as well as the largest tax breaks in history is also a way of setting prices, just capless ones in which we, the taxpayers, pay the bubble price for oil. Either way I think we are getting screwed.

patrick, thanks for the letter. I hope you mailed it.